Lince Platform: social innovation for refugees, immigrants and stateless people
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i17.p189-204Keywords:
Lince, Refugees, Immigrants, Stateless, TransculturalismAbstract
The number of people forced to move around the world has increased significantly in the last 20 years. Considering this scenario, the Lince Platform, a result of the Technological Innovation Program, was created to support a database for the reception, legal assistance and social inclusion of refugees, immigrants and stateless persons in Brazil. For this purpose, this study first collected data on the most evidente needs and demands of the platform’s target audience by means of bibliographic and documentary research, besides fieldwork on migrants’ experience reports and interviews with public and private agencies. In the virtual space of the Lince Platform, of collective use, members may work collaboratively, experimenting with forms of sociability and collectively proposing discussions, projects and other forms of mobilization and social interaction. It is expected thus that the platform may, in the short, medium and long term, serve as a starting point for developing proposals that engage refugees, immigrants, and stateless persons in participatory diagnostic activities and in the planning of democratic public policies, considering how they appropriate the new territory in which they are inserted.
References
ALTO COMISSARIADO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA REFUGIADOS. Declaração de Cartagena, Cartagena, 1984. Disponível em: <https://www.acnur.org/fileadmin/Documentos/portugues/BD_Legal/Instrumentos_Internacionais/Declaracao_de_Cartagena.pdf>. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2018.
BASTIANI, A. C. B.; PELLENZ, M. Cidadania transnacional: a integração jurídica na sociedade globalizada. Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito/UFRGS, Porto Alegre, v. 10, n. 2, 2015. Disponível em: <https://seer.ufrgs.br/ppgdir/article/view/54413>. Acesso em: 1 nov. 2020.
BORRÁS, S. The widening and deepening of innovation policy: what conditions provide for effective governance? CIRCLE, Lund, n. 2, 1-20, 2009.
BRANDSEN, T. et al. Social innovation: a sympathetic and critical interpretation. In: BRANDSEN, T. et al. (Ed.). Social innovations in the urban context. New York: Springer, 2016. p. 3-18. Disponível em: <https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-21551-8.pdf>. Acesso em: 1 jun. 2020.
CADEMARTORI, D. M. L. Limites e possibilidades de uma cidadania transnacional: uma apreensão histórico-conceitual. In: CRUZ, P. M.; STELZER, J. (Org.). Direito e transnacionalidade. Curitiba: Juruá, p. 139-171, 2011.
CANCLINI, N. G. Culturas híbridas. São Paulo: Edusp, 2008.
DEVEREUX, G. Ethnopsychanalyse complémentariste. Paris: Flammarion, 1972.
DUBAR, C. A crise das identidades: a interpretação de uma mutação. São Paulo: Edusp, 2009.
FRIEDMAN, S. T. O “falar da fronteira”, o hibridismo e performatividade: teoria da cultura e identidade nos espaços intertisciais da diferença. Revista crítica de ciências sociais, Coimbra, n. 61, p. 5-28, 2001.
HALL, S. A identidade cultural na pós-modernidade. 11. ed. rev. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A, 2006.
JUBILUT, L. L. O Direito internacional dos refugiados e sua aplicação no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. São Paulo: Método, 2007.
LÉVY, P. A inteligência coletiva: por uma antropologia do ciberespaço. São Paulo: Loyola, 2007.
MINISTÉRIO DA JUSTIÇA E SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA. Processos de refúgio ganham celeridade com sistema eletrônico. Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública, Brasília, DF, 15 abr. 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.justica.gov.br/news/collective-nitf-content-1555339316.07>. Acesso em: 4 mai. 2020.
MINISTÉRIO DA JUSTIÇA E SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA. Projeto de cooperação para análise das decisões de refúgio no Brasil. Microsoft Power BI, [S. l.], c2022. Disponível em: <https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiNTQ4MTU0NGItYzNkMi00M2MwLWFhZWMtMDBiM2I1NWVjMTY5IiwidCI6ImU1YzM3OTgxLTY2NjQtNDEzNC04YTBjLTY1NDNkMmFmODBiZSIsImMiOjh9>. Acesso em: 29 mai. 2020.
MONTEIRO, A. O que é a inovação social? Maleabilidade conceitual e implicações práticas. Dados – Revista de Ciências Sociais, Rio de Janeiro, v. 62, n. 3, p. 1-34, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/dados/a/TgyQQ73yL9qF5R3xvSS3J9L/?format=pdf&lang=pt. Acesso em: 1 jun. 2020.
MONTGOMERY, T. Are social innovation paradigms incommensurable?. Voluntas, v. 27, 2016, p. 1979-2000.
MULGAN, G. et al. Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: Young Foundation, 2007.
RICHEZ-BATTESTI, N.; PETRELLA, F.; VALLADE, D. L'innovation sociale, une notion aux usages pluriels: quels enjeux et défis pour l'analyse? Innovations, Paris, n. 38, p. 15-36, 2012. Disponível em: <https://www.cairn.info/revue-innovations-2012-2-page-15.htm>. Acesso em: 2 jun. 2020.
SARTORI, G. La sociedad multiétnica: pluralismo, multiculturalismo y extranjeros. Mexico: Taurus, 2001.
UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES. Chapter 1: introduction. UNHCR, [S. l.], 2019a. Disponível em: <https://www.unhcr.org/globaltrends2018/#_ga=2.156503035.1769751291.1590774765-2131667031.1590774765>. Acesso em: 27 jan. 2022.
UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES. Global trends: forced displacement in 2019. Geneva: UNHCR, 2019b. Disponível em: <https://www.unhcr.org/5ee200e37/#_ga=2.49808356.316472380.1643301248-396203509.1643301248>. Acesso em: 29 mai. 2020.
VLACHOU, M. (Coord.). A inclusão de migrantes e refugiados: o papel das organizações culturais. Almada: Acesso Cultura, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication;
B. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g.: publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
C. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, since this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.