Case study: the agreement on extraordinary appeal 1.171.152/sc, access to justice, digital vulnerability and the reasonable duration of the administrative process: thinking ways for people assisted by the Public Defense of the Union

Authors

  • Maria Izabel Rodrigues de Melo Defensoria Pública da União

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i16.p283-291

Keywords:

Access to Justice, Vulnerability, Wake up, INSS, Reasonability

Abstract

This case study analyzes the repercussions of the agreement in Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.171.152/SC on access to justice, digital vulnerability and the reasonable duration of the process from the perspective of the Public Defender’s Office as a whole, proposing ways to be thought of in favor of the people assisted by the defense organ.

Author Biography

Maria Izabel Rodrigues de Melo, Defensoria Pública da União

Especialista em Direito e Processo Penal. Especialista em Processo Civil e Recursos. Pós-graduanda em Advocacia Feminista e Direitos da Mulher pela Faculdade Legale. Estagiária de pós-graduação da Defensoria Pública da União. Advogada.

Downloads

Published

04-05-2022

How to Cite

Melo, M. I. R. de. (2022). Case study: the agreement on extraordinary appeal 1.171.152/sc, access to justice, digital vulnerability and the reasonable duration of the administrative process: thinking ways for people assisted by the Public Defense of the Union. Revista Da Defensoria Pública Da União, (16), 283-291. https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i16.p283-291

Issue

No. 16 (2021): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União

Section

ESTUDOS DE CASO

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

A. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication; 
B. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g.: publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
C. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, since this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.