The asylum case: an analysis of the International Court of Justice's leading judgment on political asylum and regional custom

Autores/as

  • Lutiana Valadares Fernandes Barbosa DPU e UFMG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i19.p115-140

Palabras clave:

Diplomatic asylum, Political offense, Regional custom, Refugee, Safe-conduct

Resumen

This paper offers an overview of the political background in Peru when a dispute on the political asylum of Victor Raúl Haya de la Torre between Colombia and Peru arose. The claim and counter-claim submitted to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the Court´s decision are discussed. It critically reviews the judgment's main issues to the international legal debate: the right of qualification of a political offense, the discussion over regional customary international law, the duty or not to give a safe-conduct, and what should be considered urgency for the purposes of diplomatic asylum. It claims that the unilateral qualification of the offense is essential to the character of diplomatic asylum. It highlights that this was the first decision of an international tribunal that confirms the existence of a regional custom and discusses what is necessary for a local practice to be considered regional custom. It refutes ICJ´s ruling and argues that nowadays, in the Latin-American context, the territorial State is bound to issue a safe-conduct, regardless if it requested the refugee to leave the country. It disagrees with ICJ´s restrictive interpretation of the term “urgent cases” and understands that urgency shall be construed to allow diplomatic asylum in times of political instability and prevent it in times of democratic normality.

Citas

BISHOP, W. Haya De La Torre Case (Colombia/Peru). American Journal of International Law, v. 45, n. 4, p. 781-788, 1951. doi: 10.2307/2194269.

BOCHARD, Edwin M. Declaratory Judgments in International Law. The American Journal of International Law, v. 29, n. 3, p. 488-492, jul. 1935. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2190425.

CANTOR, David; FEITH TAN, Nikolas; GKLIATI, Mariana; MAVROPOULOU, Elizabeth; ALLINSON, Kathryn; CHAKRABARTY, Sreetapa; GRUNDLER, Maja; HILLARY, Lynn; MCDONNELL, Emilie; MOODLEY, Riona; PHILLIPS, Stephen; PIJNENBURG, Annick; REYHANI, Adel-Naim; SOARES, Sophia; YACOUB, Natasha. Externalisation, Access to Territorial Asylum, and International Law. International Journal of Refugee Law, v. 34, n. 1, p. 120-156, march 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeac023.

COHEN-JONATHAN, Gérard. La coutume locale. Annuaire Français de Droit International. Paris, CNRS Éditions, 1961, p. 119-140. Available at: https://www.persee.fr/doc/afdi_0066-3085_1961_num_7_1_1080. Last visited: 7 jul. 2021.

D’AMATO, Anthony. Special Custom in International Law. American Journal of International Law, v. 63, p. 211-223, 1969.

ESSEN, J. L. F. van. Some Reflections on the Judgments of the International Court of Justice in the Asylum and Haya de la Torre Cases. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, v. 1, n. 4, p. 533-539, oct. 1952.

FISCHEL DE ANDRADE, José H. Regional Refugee Regimes: Latin America. In: COSTELLO, Cathryn; FOSTER, Michelle; MCADAM, Jane (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law. Oxford Handbooks, 2021. Available at: https://doi-org.prx.law.columbia.edu/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.18. Last visited: feb. 2023.

FOLHA DE S. PAULO, Brasil autoriza asilo a 25 militares venezuelanos em embaixada. 30 april 2019. Available at: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/mundo/2019/04/brasil-autoriza-asilo-a-25-militares-venezuelanos-em-embaixada.shtml. Last visited: 13 feb. 2023.

GANAN, Alexandre de Brites Figueiredo; PINTO, Luiz Fernando Sanná. Pátria Grande, Indo-América: a integração da América Latina na obra de Haya de la Torre. Cadernos PROLAM/USP, Ano 11, v. 1, p. 72-84, 2012.

GARCIA-BRYCE, Peru Iñigo. A Revolution Remembered, a Revolution Forgotten: The 1932 Aprista Insurrection in Trujillo. New Mexico State University, v. 7, n. 3, p. 277-322, Spring 2010. Available at: www.ncsu.edu/project/acontracorriente. Last visited: 10 apr. 2018.

HELLEINER, Eric; ANTULIO, Rosales. Toward Global IPE: The Overlooked Significance of the Haya-Mariategui Debate. International Studies Review, 17 jul. 2017. doi: 10.1093/isr/vix034.

HUGHES-GERBER, Laura. Diplomatic Asylum on the Basis of Humanitarian Considerations. In: Idem. Diplomatic Asylum. Cham: Springer, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73046-8_6.

INTERAMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Advisory opinion OC-25/18 requested by Equator. 30 may 2018.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Asylum case (Colombia v. Peru). ICJ Reports, 1950, p. 266.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Asylum case (Colombia v. Peru). ICJ Reports, 1950, p. 266. Dissenting Opinion by Judge Azevedo.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Asylum case (Colombia v. Peru). ICJ Reports, 1950, p. 266. Dissenting opinion by Judge M. Caicedo Castilla.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Asylum case (Colombia v. Peru). ICJ Reports, 1950, p. 266. Dissenting Opinion by Judge Badawi Pasha.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Asylum case (Colombia v. Peru). ICJ Reports, 1950, p. 266. Dissenting Opinion by Judge Read.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Asylum case (Colombia v. Peru). ICJ Reports 1950, p. 266. Dissenting Opinion by Judge Alvarez.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Case Concerning the Rights of Nationals f the United States of America in Morocco. ICJ Reports, 1952.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Case Concerning Right of Passage Over Indian Territory (Portugal v. India). ICJ Reports, 1960.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Certain Questions concerning Diplomatic Relations (Honduras v Brazil). Application Instituting Proceedings by the Republic of Honduras against the Federative Republic of Brazil, 28 october 2009.

LÉLLIS, Leonardo. Ritmo de progresso do Mercosul é devagar como previsto. Consultor Jurídico, 15 nov. 2014. Available at: https://www.conjur.com.br/2014-nov-15/entrevista-francisco-rezek-ex-ministro-relacoes-exteriores. Accessed: 1 jul. 2021.

McINTYRE, Juliette. Declaratory Judgments of the International Court of Justice. Hague Yearbook of International Law, 2012.

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS). Convention on Diplomatic Asylum. Treaty Series, n. 18, 28 march 1954.

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS). Treaty on International Penal Law (adopted 19 March 1940). OAS Official Records, OEA/Ser.X/1, Treaty Series, n. 34.

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS). Treaty on Political Asylum and Refuge (adopted 4 August 1939). OAS Official Records, OEA/Ser.X/1, Treaty Series, n. 34.

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS). Convention on Political Asylum, 26 December 1933. OAS Official Records, OEA/Ser.X/I, Treaty Series, n. 34.

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS). Havana Convention on Asylum, 20 February 1928. OAS Official Records, OEA/Ser.X/I, Treaty Series, n. 34.

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS). Treaty on International Penal Law, 23 January 1889. OAS Official Records, OEA/Ser.X/7, Treaty Series, n. 34.

PAYNE, James. Peru: The Politics of Structured Violence. The Journal of Politics, v. 27, n. 2, may 1965, p. 362-374. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2128078.

REFUGEE LAW INITIATIVE. Declaration on Externalisation and Asylum. 29 june 2022. Available at: https://rli.sas.ac.uk/sites/default/files/files/RLI%20Declaration_Externalisation_ 2022.pdf. Last visited: 13 feb. 2023.

SANDY, Matt. Diplomatic war erupts after Bolivian senator flees to Brazil. The Independent, 28 august 2013. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/diplomatic-war-erupts-after-bolivian-senator-flees-to-brazil-8785183.html.

SHAWN, Malcolm N. International Law. Cambridge University Press, 6th ed., 2008.

SHELTON, Dinah L. Form, Function, and the Powers of International Courts. The Chinese Journal of International Law, 537, 2009. Available at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2053&context=faculty_publications.

TAMS, Christian. The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice. 2017. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3086269. Last visited: 2 jul. 2021.

UNITED NATIONS. Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 april 1946. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3deb4b9c0.html. Accessed: 12 july 2018.

UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Question of Diplomatic Asylum. Report of the Secretary-General. General Assembly, 22 september 1975, Thirtieth session. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/protection/historical/3ae68bf10/question-diplomatic-asylum-report-secretary-general.html. Last visited: 2 jul. 2021.

VARK, Rene. Diplomatic asylum: Theory, Practice and the Case of Julian Assange. Sisekaitseakadeemia Toimetised, 2012.

##submission.downloads##

Publicado

23-06-2023

Cómo citar

Valadares Fernandes Barbosa, L. (2023). The asylum case: an analysis of the International Court of Justice’s leading judgment on political asylum and regional custom. Revista Da Defensoria Pública Da União, 19(19), 115-140. https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i19.p115-140