A inconstitucionalidade da sanção disciplinar de cassação de aposentadoria: direito de aposentar, necessidade de punição disciplinar e preenchimento dos requisitos para aposentadoria

Authors

  • Wilbran Schneider Borges Junior

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i08.p%25p

Keywords:

Discipline. Forfeiture. Retirement. Unconstitutionality. Vested right.

Abstract

The work will demonstrate that the forfeiture of retirement as a disciplinary sanction does not have the scope to also withdraw the right to retire from the former server. Once completed the legal requirements for granting it is the duty of the State to grant it. The plaster application of the law, as occurs in this case, does not distinguish between the autonomy disciplinary legal system and the social security system that the server is bound, especially when related to the own servers Regime. The discipline must be fought by the public authorities but may not exceed totally autonomous and fundamental rights of the server, including the retirement. Retirement is legal heritage Untouchable server for disciplinary administrative decision. The social security law must be viewed in focus departed, after the application of disciplinary action, this specific and unique context of administrative law. Moreover, the loss of insured status in the Special Policy, which
occurred due to resignation or retirement cancellation without prejudice, does not affect the right to retirement, to which occurred completing all legal requirements. In the near future, the subject tends to experience a peace in the Supreme Court, north it will be for all legal relationships under these conditions.

Published

07-12-2018

How to Cite

Schneider Borges Junior, W. (2018). A inconstitucionalidade da sanção disciplinar de cassação de aposentadoria: direito de aposentar, necessidade de punição disciplinar e preenchimento dos requisitos para aposentadoria. Revista Da Defensoria Pública Da União, 1(08). https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i08.p%p