The effectiveness of fundamental standards in the field of public civil action: a focus on collective litigation in the light of the new Code of Brazilian Civil Procedure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i12.p225-246Keywords:
Public Civil Action, Collective litigation, Fundamental rules, Normative force of principles, New Code of Civil ProcedureAbstract
The objective of this monographic work is to demonstrate the importance of the effectiveness of the fundamental norms - normative force of the principles - foreseen in the General Part of the new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code - CPC / 2015 - insofar as there is the adequacy to the specificities of the public civil action, especially with regard to adequate representation. Through a bibliographical review, the work is developed in the following topics: public civil action as special procedure, historical brief, protected object, collective litigation; the fundamental rules of the new civil procedure code; collective litigation and the effectiveness of fundamental rights norms. It is hereby adopted the understanding that the public civil action is a special procedure due not only to the collective rights latu sensu that has as object of tutelage, but also as a result of the collective litigation that is presented to the State-judge; however, that such an argument can not be sustained to the point of removing the discipline of the collective proceeding by the civil procedure code.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
A. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication;
B. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g.: publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
C. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, since this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.