Access to justice, special curator and cost of proceedings seen from the peculiar case of the (non) granting legal aid to the defaulting defendant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i13.p116-142Keywords:
Free legal aid. Constructive service of process. Special curatorship. Brazilian Public Defender’s Office.Abstract
This work is part of the court costs debate, a delicate issues, especially concerning the Brazilian Public Defender's Office. It aims to analyze the position of Brazilian Superior Court of Justice regarding the granting of suing in forma pauperis, provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, to the defendant, party served through constructive service of process, and thus represented on judicial process by what is called special curatorship, usually carried out by the Public Defender's Office. One of the hypotheses for not granting the benefit, in principle, would be the lack of legitimacy of the Office of the Defensoria to request it and judgment, which is soon dismissed. As a result of the search for judgments in the Court's database, it is clear that the current understanding is that the benefit of the absentee defendant is not presumed, since the Public Defender would not, obviously, have any personal contact with him, whose economic conditions could not be verified. This is the majority position of the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice, although there are precedents that do not require recursal preparation, recognizing the need to protect the right to due process and adversary system.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
A. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication;
B. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g.: publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
C. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, since this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.