Considerations about the absolute presumption of misery in LOAS: an analysis in light of the thesis defined in IRDR 5013036-79.2017.4.04.0000 / Rs judged by the TRF 4th region

Authors

  • Sabrina Nunes Vieira Especialista em Direito Público pelo Centro Universitário Newton Paiva - Defensora Pública Federal DPU/MG
  • Carolina Godoy Leite Villaça Especialista em Direito Público e Direito Previdenciário pela Universidade de Caxias do Sul – UCS - Defensora Pública Federal, DPU/MG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i12.p275-293

Keywords:

Welfare benefit, Misery, Income per capita, Presuption juris et de jure

Abstract

This article presents a study of the legal income criteria used for granting the welfare benefit payed to welders and disabled people. It starts with a short historical analysis of the benefit, highlighting the main changes in jurisprudence regarding, especially, the interpretation of the law nº 8742/1993, article 20, §3rd, and the variations on its definition as legal presumption juris et de jure or juris tantum. Then, the article studies the judgment given by the Federal Appeal’s Court in the 4th Region (TRF4) in the IRDR 5013036- 79.2017.4.04.0000/RS, stablishing absolute presumption of misery when the family income per capita fits the legal criteria determined by the law.

Downloads

Published

08-11-2019

How to Cite

Vieira, S. N., & Leite Villaça, C. G. (2019). Considerations about the absolute presumption of misery in LOAS: an analysis in light of the thesis defined in IRDR 5013036-79.2017.4.04.0000 / Rs judged by the TRF 4th region. Revista Da Defensoria Pública Da União, (12), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i12.p275-293

Issue

No. 12 (2019): Federal Public Defender´´'s Office Journal

Section

RIGHT TO SOCIAL SECURITY

License

A. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication; 
B. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g.: publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
C. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, since this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.